<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for unspecified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bogott.net/unspecified/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified</link>
	<description>unspecified</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 21:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why an eternity of data storage should only cost a bit more than a year of data storage by Ted C</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1468#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 21:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1468#comment-947</guid>
		<description>That chart would have been good for me to have around last week.  I was ambushed during a technology evaluation with &quot;why aren&#039;t you deleting data more aggressively&quot;.  I wanted to say that the ever dropping rate of storage costs made the savings from more aggressive purging moot, but didn&#039;t have the data on-hand to make the case.  Also &quot;enterprise class&quot; storage is the land that storage economics forgot, as the $/GB ratios appear to lag the cost of raw storage by 10 to 15 years, even with allowances for increased redundancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That chart would have been good for me to have around last week.  I was ambushed during a technology evaluation with &#8220;why aren&#8217;t you deleting data more aggressively&#8221;.  I wanted to say that the ever dropping rate of storage costs made the savings from more aggressive purging moot, but didn&#8217;t have the data on-hand to make the case.  Also &#8220;enterprise class&#8221; storage is the land that storage economics forgot, as the $/GB ratios appear to lag the cost of raw storage by 10 to 15 years, even with allowances for increased redundancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s like the book says, &#8216;grain-based desserts and pizza are the staff of life&#8217; by andrew</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1451#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1451#comment-929</guid>
		<description>For a minute I was puzzled about &#039;salad dressing&#039; being on the list until I realized that it&#039;s probably mostly ranch, and probably mostly not on salads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a minute I was puzzled about &#8216;salad dressing&#8217; being on the list until I realized that it&#8217;s probably mostly ranch, and probably mostly not on salads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raising Caridina cf. propinqua, &#8216;Borneo Orange shrimp&#8217; by A Caridina cf. Propinqua Journal - Page 22</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1415#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>A Caridina cf. Propinqua Journal - Page 22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1415#comment-834</guid>
		<description>[...] I haven&#039;t read all of your entries yet, but skipped to the end to link you to my page here:  http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1415  I look forward to reading back through your history to see if your conclusions are the same as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I haven&#039;t read all of your entries yet, but skipped to the end to link you to my page here:  <a href="http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1415" rel="nofollow">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1415</a>  I look forward to reading back through your history to see if your conclusions are the same as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raising C. Multidentata by Donny</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1148#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1148#comment-324</guid>
		<description>ps. - I discovered your blog via the IKEA Solsta Sofa Bed post...and came across the shrimp page, something I am very interested in : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps. &#8211; I discovered your blog via the IKEA Solsta Sofa Bed post&#8230;and came across the shrimp page, something I am very interested in : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raising C. Multidentata by Donny</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1148#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?page_id=1148#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Congrats and thanks for sharing your experience with keeping and breeding this shrimp.  This is the first successful account I&#039;ve read about regarding this species; I will definitely share with others!

Donny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats and thanks for sharing your experience with keeping and breeding this shrimp.  This is the first successful account I&#8217;ve read about regarding this species; I will definitely share with others!</p>
<p>Donny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-scoot by Mary</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1265#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1265#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I saw an electric bike at Menard&#039;s. It was around $400 (don&#039;t quote me on that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an electric bike at Menard&#8217;s. It was around $400 (don&#8217;t quote me on that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 100 Unblinking Eyes by josh</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1169#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1169#comment-135</guid>
		<description>(Which, coupled with the fact that acid, nor oxygen depletion, nor heat nor cold will kill them, maybe makes having hundreds of them hatching in your basement a scary idea.  If you get the odd freak goby with a larger-than-average frontal cortex then it&#039;ll walk upstairs and raise heck.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Which, coupled with the fact that acid, nor oxygen depletion, nor heat nor cold will kill them, maybe makes having hundreds of them hatching in your basement a scary idea.  If you get the odd freak goby with a larger-than-average frontal cortex then it&#8217;ll walk upstairs and raise heck.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 100 Unblinking Eyes by josh</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1169#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1169#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Dang - they can gulp air and hang onto rocks with their pelvic fins.  Sounds like they&#039;re right on the verge of climbing out of the mud-puddles altogether and evolving opposable thumbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang &#8211; they can gulp air and hang onto rocks with their pelvic fins.  Sounds like they&#8217;re right on the verge of climbing out of the mud-puddles altogether and evolving opposable thumbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Product endorsement by Rs</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=849#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Rs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/2010/02/27/product-endorsement/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>That was the best explanation of anything ever I just got one yesterday and thought &quot;huh wait a minute this isnt so great :S&quot; Worst thing is the dam thing was faulty so have to go 70km to return the dam thing at least after reading this im not going to get an exchange just going to get a straight refund !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the best explanation of anything ever I just got one yesterday and thought &#8220;huh wait a minute this isnt so great :S&#8221; Worst thing is the dam thing was faulty so have to go 70km to return the dam thing at least after reading this im not going to get an exchange just going to get a straight refund !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on  by Meghan</title>
		<link>http://bogott.net/unspecified/?p=1005#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogott.net/unspecified/2010/06/28/1005/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>FWIW, the OED says:

&quot;In the sense of cl. L. discretus, discrete was used by Trevisa (translating from L.), but app. was not in general use till late in 16th c. But in another sense, ‘discerning, prudent’ (derived through French), discret, discrete  was well-known in popular use from the 14th c.; this, even in late ME., was occasionally spelt discreet, which spelling was appropriated to it about the time that discrete in the L. sense began to be common; so that thenceforth discrete and discreet were differentiated in spelling as well as in meaning: see DISCREET. Before this, while discrete was the prevalent form for the later discreet, it is only rarely (see 1{beta}  below) that discreet appears for the present discrete.] &quot;

and

&quot;[ME. discret, discrete, a. F. discret, -ète (12th c. in Littré), ‘qui se conduit avec discernement’, ad. L. discretus, in late L. and Rom. sense: cf. It. and Sp. discreto ‘discreet, wise, wary, considerate, circumspect’ (Florio), ‘discreet, wise to perceiue’ (Minsheu). A doublet of DISCRETE, differentiated in sense and spelling.
  In cl. Lat., discret-us had only the sense ‘separate, distinct’, as pa. pple. of discernere, whence the corresponding mod.F. sense of discret, and Eng. DISCRETE. The late L. sense, which alone came down in popular use in Romanic, seems to have been deduced from the cognate n. discretion, originally the action of separating, distinguishing, or discerning, and then the faculty of discernment; hence the adjective may have taken the sense ‘possessed of discernment’.
  In Eng., discrete was the prevalent spelling in all senses until late in the 16th c., when on the analogy of native or early-adopted words in ee from ME. close e, as feet, sweet, beet), the spelling discreet (occasional from 1400) became established in the popular sense, leaving discrete for the scholastic and technical sense in which the kinship to L. discretus is more obvious: see DISCRETE. Shakespeare (1st Folio) has always discreet.] &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, the OED says:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the sense of cl. L. discretus, discrete was used by Trevisa (translating from L.), but app. was not in general use till late in 16th c. But in another sense, ‘discerning, prudent’ (derived through French), discret, discrete  was well-known in popular use from the 14th c.; this, even in late ME., was occasionally spelt discreet, which spelling was appropriated to it about the time that discrete in the L. sense began to be common; so that thenceforth discrete and discreet were differentiated in spelling as well as in meaning: see DISCREET. Before this, while discrete was the prevalent form for the later discreet, it is only rarely (see 1{beta}  below) that discreet appears for the present discrete.] &#8221;</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;[ME. discret, discrete, a. F. discret, -ète (12th c. in Littré), ‘qui se conduit avec discernement’, ad. L. discretus, in late L. and Rom. sense: cf. It. and Sp. discreto ‘discreet, wise, wary, considerate, circumspect’ (Florio), ‘discreet, wise to perceiue’ (Minsheu). A doublet of DISCRETE, differentiated in sense and spelling.<br />
  In cl. Lat., discret-us had only the sense ‘separate, distinct’, as pa. pple. of discernere, whence the corresponding mod.F. sense of discret, and Eng. DISCRETE. The late L. sense, which alone came down in popular use in Romanic, seems to have been deduced from the cognate n. discretion, originally the action of separating, distinguishing, or discerning, and then the faculty of discernment; hence the adjective may have taken the sense ‘possessed of discernment’.<br />
  In Eng., discrete was the prevalent spelling in all senses until late in the 16th c., when on the analogy of native or early-adopted words in ee from ME. close e, as feet, sweet, beet), the spelling discreet (occasional from 1400) became established in the popular sense, leaving discrete for the scholastic and technical sense in which the kinship to L. discretus is more obvious: see DISCRETE. Shakespeare (1st Folio) has always discreet.] &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

